Anywhere in the world, an election
campaign has always been one the most memorable and exciting events in a
democratic country where suffrage is a part of life. Naturally, either the
national or local elections have significantly influenced the social and
financial environments even for a short period of the election campaign.
Oftentimes, winning or losing an
election could either “make” or “break” candidates, both as politicians and
individuals. Many had said that politicians belong to a rare breed of people. Those who run for public offices are
ambitious, determined and highly competitive individuals. It is maybe for these
reasons that politicians take defeat as very hard on them and their families
with some even going into temporary or complete obscurity.
According to Presidential
Historian William A. Chafe, former US Pres. Bill Clinton hit a “period of
immense depression and was disconsolate for months” after losing the Arkansas
gubernatorial election in 1980. Fortunately for him, his wife Hillary Clinton
“came to his rescue” by strengthening their relationship bond at his low ebb and
personally formulated his next campaign plan that won him back the
gubernatorial position in 1982 that eventually led to the US presidency in
1992.
Photo courtesy of en.wikipilipinas.org |
Although the untimely demise of matinee idol
Fernando Poe Jr. was never officially reported as a result of an emotional
breakdown, there were lingering whispers among close associates and friends that
Da King found it arduous to accept his defeat on the 2004 Presidential election
with his strong suspicion of a mammoth election cheating by his political
opponents.
Election Campaign Strategies in the Philippines
Photo courtesy of newshopper.sulekha.com |
Similar to formulating a
strategic management plan for business projects, politicians must realize the
paramount importance of formulating and implementing a political campaign plan
long before the start of the campaign period. Most professional campaign
operators nowadays employ the most modern and scientific approaches to running
a campaign similar to operating a business project.
Just like in a business feasibility
study, an environmental scanning is essentially necessary knowing the fact that
an election campaign is a fiercely competitive episode in a political world. Oftentimes, campaign planners utilize the (S-W-O-T)
analysis approach that takes into consideration the internal environment, Strengths and Weaknesses of the candidate including the available resources and
the external environment in terms of the Opportunities
and Threats provided by the political
scenario and by the political opponents, respectively.
Based
on the findings of the environmental scanning, a campaign plan can now be
created with the end view of utilizing the candidate’s strengths, strengthening
the weaknesses, taking timely actions on the opportunities and confronting
threats from political adversaries.
In crafting a political campaign design, we should always
remember there is no single “best” campaign strategy. The most
effective strategy will vary for each individual candidate and for a particular
election, whether it is a national or local election and other parameters.
Campaigns for local elections are very
dissimilar from national campaigns. If
you're a new candidate who is running for office in a local election political
campaign, you might be confused about what kind of strategy you should use for
winning votes. If a city or municipality is small enough, a candidate may be
able to personally meet and shake hands with many of the voters by walking
through the sitios, puroks and barangays of the community. While candidates in
national positions are not afforded this luxury, local elections allow candidates
to do the “leg work” to personally attempt to “win voters” by personal contact.
Many campaign planners have confirmed
that many candidates for local elections regretted spending a big sum of money with the hope to win a local election. Many
stories have been passed around where candidates were reported to have spent
millions in their campaigns only to end up as losers, simply because the money
was not spent to where it was intended to but rather settled in the pockets of
political aides and leaders.
With this in mind, local candidates
should not make the mistake of thinking that in order to win, they need to
spend huge amount of money on your campaign. If you're facing a deficit of
campaign funds and still want to get your message and name out to the voters,
then be prepared to devote at least an hour a night for door-to-door campaigning in the three months before election day.
Candidates for local elections will be able to meet and reach out to literally
thousands of voters by using simple and
effective door handouts that outline your background and campaign message,
This kind of “leg work” campaigning doesn't cost a lot of money, but it is
extremely effective in local elections since most political candidates simply
won't take the time to mount an effective grassroots campaign since it's so
labor intensive and considered as hard work. If a candidate ever decides to be
perseverant in his local campaign by putting in extra time and dedication to
visit voters in their own homes and neighborhood, in most likelihood he will
have a huge advantage over his opponents.
Photo courtesy of www.flickr.com |
Election Planners and Managers
Many political
analysts have established that a family-run
campaign does not necessarily translate into an efficient and effective
undertaking. The most experienced “political
dynasties” in the Philippines have even elevated political campaigning to
an art, and over the passage of time have acquired the mastery of how to
maximize the utilization of their overall resources as well as their political
and social connections. This is very true with influential families who are
especially skilled at the political maneuvers by putting the charismatic and
appealing family members at the frontlines while assigning the crafty and the
cunning ones to the management side.
They are very adept in mobilizing the clan and its network for other
tasks in the campaign, including recruitment of campaigners, survey takers, poll
watchers, bodyguards, political “barkers “ and political “underground
agents.”
However as new
developments emerged in the political world, election campaigns of today
utilize services of “public relations” and event management groups to manage election
campaigns especially in the national level in order to ensure victory. In
highly developed countries, election campaigns had created a new trade known as
the “campaign management” industry
which is a direct descendant of the public-relations profession.
A political
consultant had said that most of these professionals, though, remain in the
background. "It's an underground industry-most of these people don't carry
calling cards, don't introduce themselves, don't appear at press conferences,
don't advertise their services. "They get hired by referral and by word of
mouth. The really good ones are overloaded with clients and forced to turn down
others."
"You let the spotlight fall only on your
principal," a political consultant adds. Another one says, "The
professionals are often relegated to the backroom, or they don't have the
reputation to face the public. "Undocumented
experts," is how yet another political consultant describes himself
and his peers.
Of course the
clandestineness is understandable. Most of them have day jobs, either as news
reporters, columnists, businessmen, advertising executives, legislative staff,
or even current civil servants. Besides, in the professions where they
officially belong, moonlighting for politicians is an ethical taboo. Broadcast
and mass communications journalists working as public relations practitioners
or political consultants.
“Winnability” of a Candidate
The candidate’s “total package” can be easily determined by his qualifications, political experience and performance, and his overall knowledge of important issues that will result to the current public perception. Likewise, it is necessary for campaign planners to ascertain the chance of both national and local candidates to win the election.
Both being an incumbent candidate and a
challenger in an elective position have its own set of advantages and
disadvantages.
Definitely,
incumbent candidates for local positions have already their own “political base” in certain localities and
demographics in the community, and having a monumental advantage in terms of “name recall”. Having said that, it is a fact
that most incumbent candidates are well-funded and enjoy the liberty to use government’s
resources such as vehicles, funds and manpower, specifically the temporary and
casual employees, during the campaign period. On the one hand, an incumbent
candidate who has laudable performances to run on is perceived to be almost
unbeatable. On the other hand, an incumbent with a lackluster performance and
plenty of negative political issues is exposed to be attacked by political
opponents, a great disadvantage of being such.
Although
this is not absolute, a challenger candidate usually have trouble raising campaign
money, and often must spend more time and personal resources raising their
identification and name “recall”. Candidates belonging to major
political parties also revel in a big advantage in terms of organization and
resources compared to those with minor political parties and independent
candidates.
March
17, 2013 Rocklin, CA USA
Watch out for the exciting concluding article to this four-part series!
No comments:
Post a Comment